I have found recently that some chiropractic doctors are beginning to use the term 'nerve signal interference'. This fact actually lends support to my position as a Nerve Signal Interference (NSI) Specialist in that they have FINALLY begun to refer properly to the so-called 'nerve interference' that they profess to deal with. Unfortunately, they still want to say that the primary interference is CAUSED by the curvature of the spinal column itself. They refuse to recognize that this curvature is simply a normal compensatory response from other causes directly above and below the spine itself.
Dr. Craton, so many times, instilled in me the proper vocabulary of his field. He explained that the chiropractors wanted to call the vital living force of the body the 'nerve impulse', 'nerve force', 'nerve flow', & 'mental impulse'. He said that it was none of the above and instead defined that all important property as the 'nerve signal'.
To date, the chiropractors as a whole, are still not using the proper terminology while referring to the interference of the nerve signal. And, since Dr. Dieringer had actually gotten the terminology right up to that point, I had high hopes of leading him toward the light of truth in the rest of his philosophy.
His mention of spinal misalignments, and re-adjusting the spine are STILL of the old school of chiropractic error. Albeit he has made progress toward truth in his use of the term 'nerve signal interference' he has not taken the NECESSARY step forward in order to separate himself from other erroneous preconceptions of his prior conditioning. And, I cannot currently endorse his use of the term 'nerve signal interference' since his understanding of the proper biomechanics of the body is obviously stagnated. (His comments place credibility in the 'vertebral subluxation' school of thought.)
Please see below.
